PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 30.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 24.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P7P55D-E PRO (all builds) |
Memory | 7.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100827 |
Uptime | 10 Days |
Run Date | Dec 26 '20 at 12:56 |
Run Duration | 209 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 8% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
77.8%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30.3%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
INTENSO 512GB
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 68 70 58 58 58 MB/s
|
24.5%
Poor
|
|||
Emtec X150 240GB
132GB free
Firmware: SBFMJ1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 191 191 196 197 198 MB/s
|
57.5%
Above average
|
|||
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB
31GB free
Firmware: 10.02E02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 59 59 59 59 MB/s
|
30.8%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$20
29GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 78 79 79 79 80 MB/s
|
39.2%
Below average
|
|||
WD Elements 10B8 1.5TB
98GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 25 24 25 25 MB/s
|
10.7%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Elements 25A1 2TB
974GB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
|
||||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
454GB free, PID 0201
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 114 115 114 104 MB/s
|
47.2%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 12GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
|
48.8%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 79x |
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples | 76x |
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 74x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 24x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 22x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 12x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 66% - Good | Total price: $426 |