Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics41.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateDec 24 '20 at 12:17
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 71%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 3000G-$80
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
43.9% Average
Memory 57.2
1-Core 79.6
2-Core 150
54% 95.4 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 217
25% 193 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Zotac(19DA 3595) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.6% Average
Lighting 50.5
Reflection 55.1
Parallax 49
41% 51.5 fps
MRender 63.2
Gravity 48.9
Splatting 46.6
42% 52.9 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2009)-$30
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 26 30 27 38 35 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
23.4% Poor
Read 52.2
Write 32.5
Mixed 35.4
SusWrite 29.1
28% 37.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
96% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 41%
Hitachi HDS721616PLA380 160GB-$46
45GB free
Firmware: P22OABEA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 30 31 30 31 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
24.6% Poor
Read 55.5
Write 27.1
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 30.2
26% 35.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
90% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 39%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$23
80GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 73 73 72 74 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 78.2
Write 81
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 73.1
51% 69.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL16-18-18 D4-3200 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
30.2% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 10
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 9.9
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 5,977 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $323
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback