PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 18.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 39.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus F2A85-V PRO (all builds) |
Memory | 11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20121016 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Dec 24 '20 at 01:46 |
Run Duration | 146 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 16% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)-$467
FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
|
41.6%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD HD 7850-$174
Sapphire(174B E221) 2GB
CLim: 860 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20
|
18.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial M500 240GB-$79
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 88 71 64 65 72 MB/s
|
39.9%
Below average
|
|||
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
375GB free
Firmware: 1AG01119
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 82 84 84 84 83 MB/s
|
46.1%
Average
|
|||
Samsung M3 Portable 2TB
460GB free
Firmware: 1402
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 74 76 76 76 76 MB/s
|
40.8%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 M378B5273CH0-CH9 M378B5273CH0-CH9 M378B5273CH0-CH9 16GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
|
24.2%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples | 25x |
A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)AMD $467Bench 51%, 11,295 samples | 18x |
A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples | 8x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon HD 8670DAMDBench 5%, 5,822 samples | 10x |
Radeon HD 7660DAMDBench 5%, 7,665 samples | 5x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 63% - Good | Total price: $284 |