Asus F1A55-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus F1A55-M  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120831
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '20 at 12:29
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3820 APU
FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
43.9% Average
Memory 66.5
1-Core 38
2-Core 73.9
39% 59.5 Pts
4-Core 125
8-Core 128
17% 127 Pts
64-Core 140
9% 140 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6550D
Asus(1043 84C8) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
2.33% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 4.4
2% 3.27 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 4.1
3% 3.43 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.33%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 169 144 143 147 145 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.1% Average
Read 174
Write 177
Mixed 170
SusWrite 152
38% 168 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 30.3
4K Mixed 27.8
84% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 32.5
DQ Write 60.3
DQ Mixed 40.3
32% 44.4 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 115%
Hitachi HDS721064CLA332 640GB
367GB free
Firmware: JPGOA3GH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 64 65 64 66 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
49% Average
Read 106
Write 115
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 64.9
63% 86.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 49%
Great: 66%
Seagate STM31000528AS 1TB
125GB free
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 97 96 95 99 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
58% Above average
Read 105
Write 103
Mixed 55.4
SusWrite 96.8
66% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 58%
Great: 68%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
469GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 64 65 64 66 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 140
Write 117
Mixed 64.7
SusWrite 65
71% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
231% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.8% Very poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 5.7
18% 6.23 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 4.6
12% 4.27 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F1A55-M Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A55-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $146
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback