Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-9220 APU (2016 M.SR) 4,762 User benchmarks, average bench 29% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	17.1% Very poor	Memory 26.6 1-Core 36.9 2-Core 54.7 23% 39.4 Pts	4-Core 45.7 8-Core 40.2 6% 43 Pts	64-Core 76.6 5% 76.6 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 Graphics 13,349 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 8324) 80MB Ram: 80MB, Driver: 19.10.16 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	0.89% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 1.6 Parallax 3.7 1% 2.07 fps	MRender 1.8 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.9 1% 1.4 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 0.89% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar SSD 240GB 2,170 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 169GB free (System drive) Firmware: R1029A Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 266 Mixed 174 48% 220 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 18.8 4K Mixed 12.9 52% 16.2 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 111 DQ Mixed 32.8 47% 86.9 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 168%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GB 40,829 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.6% Very poor	MC Read 6.1 MC Write 7.2 MC Mixed 6.9 19% 6.73 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 6.6 14% 4.93 GB/s	Latency 276 14% 276 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.6% Great: 38%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 29%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon R4 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 13,349 samples	17x
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples	15x
Radeon R2 GraphicsAMDBench 1%, 4,424 samples	9x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	14x
M471A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GBSamsungBench 32%, 40,829 samples	8x
HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 1x4GBHynixBench 32%, 9,575 samples	4x

Value: 18% - Very poor

Total price: $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16