Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 45% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	45.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	86.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4S (all builds)
Memory	4.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190506
Uptime	5.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 06 '20 at 04:54
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	88.7% Excellent	Memory 81.3 1-Core 145 2-Core 283 92% 170 Pts	4-Core 515 8-Core 985 89% 750 Pts	64-Core 1,302 81% 1,302 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 88.7% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% MSI(1462 3602) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.38 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.6% Average	Lighting 16.6 Reflection 168 Parallax 161 14% 115 fps	MRender 120 Gravity 170 Splatting 112 108% 134 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 300GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 347 397 389 376 362 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	86.2% Excellent	Read 413 Write 363 Mixed 314 SusWrite 370 82% 365 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 71.6 4K Mixed 26.9 106% 40.3 MB/s	DQ Read 364 DQ Write 300 DQ Mixed 236 203% 300 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 183GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 377 313 302 291 286 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	95.2% Outstanding	Read 419 Write 418 Mixed 400 SusWrite 325 88% 390 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 75.9 4K Mixed 40.6 138% 48.8 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 333 DQ Mixed 349 264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 95.2% Great: 133%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74 180,890 User benchmarks, average bench 228% 152GB free Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1211 824 507 375 376 358 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	192% Outstanding	Read 1348 Write 1,531 Mixed 1,237 SusWrite 608 266% 1,181 MB/s	4K Read 35.6 4K Write 109 4K Mixed 52.1 178% 65.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,115 DQ Write 924 DQ Mixed 1034 770% 1,024 MB/s
Poor: 164% ↑ This bench: 192% Great: 276%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2666 C16 Series 2x8GB 7,618 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	56.1% Above average	MC Read 22.5 MC Write 20.2 MC Mixed 18.8 59% 20.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 12.6 36% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 78.2 51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 94%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 118%

UFO

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 108%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2080Nvidia $396Bench 124%, 316,424 samples	116x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	102x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	71x

SSD
SU750 1TBAdataBench 89%, 2,753 samples	30x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	29x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	23x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	48x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	35x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	23x

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $648

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16