Performance Results


Gaming 87% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 106% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C84
Motherboard	MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) (all builds)
Memory	119.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200411
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 01 '20 at 22:19
Run Duration	205 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT-$450 16,922 User benchmarks, average bench 89% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 4.15 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	73.4% Very good	Memory 67.1 1-Core 110 2-Core 222 72% 133 Pts	4-Core 427 8-Core 838 75% 633 Pts	64-Core 2,112 131% 2,112 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466 261,508 User benchmarks, average bench 131% EVGA(3842 2085) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	114% Outstanding	Lighting 139 Reflection 215 Parallax 142 113% 165 fps	MRender 197 Gravity 153 Splatting 126 126% 159 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 139%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 120 SSD ZA1000GM10001 1TB 477 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 643GB free (System drive) Firmware: SU0SC011 SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 424 423 432 433 434 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 462 Write 432 Mixed 435 SusWrite 430 99% 440 MB/s	4K Read 39.5 4K Write 86 4K Mixed 51.2 171% 58.9 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 202 152% 203 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 136%
Sabrent Rocket Q4 2TB 2,089 User benchmarks, average bench 250% 1TB free Firmware: RKT40Q.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 3167 3135 3092 3159 3052 3135 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	396% Outstanding	Read 1,694 Write 3,256 Mixed 1686 SusWrite 3,123 556% 2,440 MB/s	4K Read 50.1 4K Write 175 4K Mixed 83.7 276% 103 MB/s	DQ Read 1,281 DQ Write 1,059 DQ Mixed 1,200 890% 1,180 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 396% Great: 421%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 216 213 218 212 213 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW64GX4M2D3600C18 4x31.8GB 580 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 4 of 4 slots used 127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	MC Read 30.8 MC Write 25.8 MC Mixed 25.5 78% 27.4 GB/s	SC Read 18 SC Write 26.1 SC Mixed 23.3 64% 22.5 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 134%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 182%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 181%

UFO

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $102Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	618x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	516x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	264x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	344x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GBCorsair $95Bench 95%, 56,114 samples	179x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 101%, 32,191 samples	152x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $1,149

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16