PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 50.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 84.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER (all builds) |
Memory | 5.6 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140910 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Dec 01 '20 at 15:33 |
Run Duration | 133 Seconds |
Run User | IDN-User |
Background CPU | 30% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
|
35%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 85C5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
50.7%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 193 178 165 150 135 MB/s
|
84.8%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
463GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 132 135 137 137 137 MB/s
|
78.8%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Adata 10GB
1600, 1333 MHz
2048, 8192 MB
|
19.5%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples | 26x |
A10-7870K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 46%, 9,821 samples | 12x |
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples | 8x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 8x |
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples | 7x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $1,119 |