Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics98.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive59.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 28 '20 at 14:51
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 77.9
1-Core 76.8
2-Core 150
62% 102 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 463
47% 370 Pts
64-Core 380
26% 380 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$359
Zotac(19DA 2435) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.1% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 131
Parallax 121
98% 124 fps
MRender 95.5
Gravity 127
Splatting 113
98% 112 fps
Poor: 89%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 105%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB-$70
323GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 188 205 205 206 205 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 364
Write 307
Mixed 200
SusWrite 200
60% 268 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 48.4
4K Mixed 27.6
97% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 27.3
DQ Write 82.3
DQ Mixed 38.2
34% 49.3 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 106%
Toshiba THNSN81Q92CSE 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 8EET6101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 218 211 211 212 213 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 388
Write 365
Mixed 310
SusWrite 212
72% 319 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 60.6
4K Mixed 34.3
115% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 30.7
DQ Write 88.5
DQ Mixed 38
35% 52.4 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 108%
Toshiba THNSN81Q92CSE 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 8EET6101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 218 212 212 212 214 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 283
Write 356
Mixed 305
SusWrite 212
65% 289 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 59
4K Mixed 33.4
112% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 27.4
DQ Write 83.3
DQ Mixed 40
35% 50.2 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial BLT8G3D1608DT1TX0. 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.6% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 14.8
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 11.8
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 84.5
47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 2,259 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $627
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Intel Core i7-11700K $346Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback