| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 43.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20191113 |
| Uptime | 1 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 25 '20 at 13:19 |
| Run Duration | 133 Seconds |
| Run User | MYS-User |
| Background CPU | 53% |
PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
62.6%
Good
|
64% 112 Pts
|
49% 409 Pts
|
47% 761 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Nvidia(10DE 1F82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
|
43.9%
Average
|
45% 53.5 fps
|
42% 52.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900813
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 84 40 51 51 71 MB/s
|
36%
Below average
|
18% 79 MB/s
|
72% 26.6 MB/s
|
124% 152 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba P300 1TB-$67
819GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 181 181 184 186 189 MB/s
|
107%
Outstanding
|
105% 145 MB/s
|
132% 1.17 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 8GBF1X08LIII43-12-K 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
|
38.5%
Below average
|
38% 13.3 GB/s
|
33% 11.7 GB/s
|
41% 97.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 5,978 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 866x |
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 714x |
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 543x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 454x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 423x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 402x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 92% - Outstanding | Total price: $323 |