Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics78.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory2.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191127
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 22 '20 at 17:43
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 65%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
59.3% Above average
Memory 52.7
1-Core 98.6
2-Core 190
61% 114 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 599
58% 476 Pts
64-Core 644
40% 644 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400
MSI(1462 3903) ≥ 4GB; gaming x trio
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.9% Very good
Lighting 112
Reflection 84.7
Parallax 95.2
91% 97.1 fps
MRender 82.1
Gravity 64.1
Splatting 61.2
56% 69.1 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,780
Write 1,718
Mixed 1,239
352% 1,579 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 88
4K Mixed 55.9
177% 60.8 MB/s
DQ Read 979
DQ Write 812
DQ Mixed 922
683% 904 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Toshiba A100 240GB
95GB free
Firmware: SBFA10.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 88 88 87 92 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 283
Write 295
Mixed 277
SusWrite 125
55% 245 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 39.4
4K Mixed 21.6
77% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 202
179% 267 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 56%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
207GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 109 113 112 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 180
Write 156
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 111
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 113%
Seagate Momentus Thin 7200 2.5" 320GB-$29
88GB free
Firmware: 0007DEM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 83 84 85 85 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 85.2
Write 84
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 84.2
55% 75 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
59.1% Above average
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 25
65% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 12.6
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 151
26% 151 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,627 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $673
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback