EVGA 132-CK-NF79

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	58.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	165% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	EVGA 132-CK-NF79 (all builds)
Memory	14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20091230
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 20 '20 at 23:14
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Extreme X9775 8 User benchmarks, average bench 50% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	60.3% Good	Memory 90 1-Core 45.6 2-Core 87.7 50% 74.4 Pts	4-Core 180 8-Core 180 24% 180 Pts	64-Core 179 11% 179 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410 30,815 User benchmarks, average bench 53% EVGA(3842 2888) 3GB CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.55 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	58.9% Above average	Lighting 73.7 Reflection 68.8 Parallax 90.7 60% 77.7 fps	MRender 81.1 Gravity 82.4 Splatting 51.3 57% 71.6 fps
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 59%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250 40,327 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 603 908 903 915 905 915 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	165% Outstanding	Read 1,208 Write 908 Mixed 582 SusWrite 858 199% 889 MB/s	4K Read 36.2 4K Write 70.1 4K Mixed 42.6 146% 49.6 MB/s	DQ Read 509 DQ Write 324 DQ Mixed 380 293% 404 MB/s
Poor: 131% ↑ This bench: 165% Great: 243%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 839GB free Firmware: MS2O SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 128 139 145 176 174 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	92.1% Outstanding	Read 177 Write 109 Mixed 27.7 SusWrite 145 83% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.3 72% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 92.1% Great: 107%
Patriot Memory 32GB 491 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 29GB free, PID 6300 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 200 Write 105 Mixed 49.2 127% 118 MB/s	4K Read 7.3 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.9 75% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DRAM Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	22.9% Poor	MC Read 7.1 MC Write 7.8 MC Mixed 5.8 20% 6.9 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 7.1 SC Mixed 6 17% 6.1 GB/s	Latency 67.2 60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 132-CK-NF79 Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 30%

Sail boat

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: EVGA 132-CK-NF79

CPU
Core2 Extreme X9770IntelBench 57%, 522 samples	13x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	7x
Core2 Quad Q9450Intel $110Bench 49%, 5,335 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	8x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	4x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	3x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
Sol id State Dis 512GBSpccBench 52%, 11 samples	4x
860 EVO 500GBSamsungBench 68%, 207 samples	3x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	15x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	11x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $228

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16