Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 13% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+ 4,133 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	23.7% Poor	Memory 41.2 1-Core 23 2-Core 34.2 23% 32.8 Pts	4-Core 40.1 8-Core 28.6 5% 34.3 Pts	64-Core 35.8 2% 35.8 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 23.7% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Gigabyte(1458 3525) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 310.90 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.08% Terrible	Lighting 1.13 Reflection 2.27 Parallax 0.44 1% 1.28 fps	MRender 2.62 Gravity 0.77 Splatting 1.7 1% 1.69 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.08% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU 630 240GB 346 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 198GB free (System drive) Firmware: XD0R SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 114 138 138 139 140 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31.3% Below average	Read 108 Write 117 Mixed 125 SusWrite 130 27% 120 MB/s	4K Read 13.8 4K Write 23.3 4K Mixed 16.3 54% 17.8 MB/s	DQ Read 29.4 DQ Write 66.2 DQ Mixed 38.1 32% 44.6 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	9.44% Terrible	MC Read 2.6 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 2.6 9% 3 GB/s	SC Read 1.4 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 3.2 7% 2.43 GB/s	Latency 197 20% 197 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 9.44% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 26%

Raft

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon LE-1600AMDBench 36%, 89 samples	3x
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+AMDBench 36%, 5,372 samples	1x
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5600+AMDBench 39%, 3,286 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 6150SE nForce 430NvidiaBench 0%, 4,836 samples	3x
GeForce 6100NvidiaBench 0%, 335 samples	2x
GeForce GT 440NvidiaBench 4%, 14,286 samples	1x

SSD
CyberX 128GBBench 67%, 50 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16