Performance Results

Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop 61%
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive79.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemIntel(R) NUC8i7BEH
MotherboardIntel NUC8BEB  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201007
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 18 '20 at 22:52
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-8559U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 73.8
1-Core 67
2-Core 133
56% 91.4 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 341
38% 292 Pts
64-Core 347
23% 347 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
Intel(8086 2074) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
11% Very poor
Lighting 13
Reflection 13.5
Parallax 15.7
10% 14.1 fps
MRender 16.5
Gravity 14.2
Splatting 0.09
12% 10.2 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11%
Great: 11%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$265
244GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR070
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 405 334 254 254 254 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 419
Write 420
Mixed 356
SusWrite 318
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 50
4K Mixed 27.9
92% 32.6 MB/s
DQ Read 337
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 326
244% 325 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown CT16G4S24AM.M16FJ 859B CT16G4SFD824A.C16FE 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.3% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 27.1
81% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 18.8
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 92.9
43% 92.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical NUC8BEB Builds (Compare 2,682 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 16%
Desktop 78%
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel NUC8BEB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $75
The Best.
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback