Asus H110-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	48.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170705
Uptime	3.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 16 '20 at 02:10
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	49%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	62.6% Good	Memory 66.7 1-Core 106 2-Core 202 69% 125 Pts	4-Core 327 8-Core 393 47% 360 Pts	64-Core 470 29% 470 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 85ED) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 445.75 Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.8% Average	Lighting 59.6 Reflection 56.8 Parallax 53.5 49% 56.6 fps	MRender 65 Gravity 61.1 Splatting 55.9 49% 60.6 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$84 21,990 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z3311000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 28 22 33 13 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	33.5% Below average	Read 294 Write 115 Mixed 155 SusWrite 24.9 32% 147 MB/s	4K Read 13 4K Write 30.8 4K Mixed 7.2 45% 17 MB/s	DQ Read 155 DQ Write 164 DQ Mixed 33.6 60% 118 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 71%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 303GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 148 142 152 160 159 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	89.2% Excellent	Read 159 Write 172 Mixed 94.3 SusWrite 151 106% 144 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1.1 214% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 89.2% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ 2x8GB 26,065 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	52.5% Above average	MC Read 20.8 MC Write 18.9 MC Mixed 19.5 56% 19.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 12 SC Mixed 12.7 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,733 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Speed boat

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 38%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus H110-PLUS

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	1,186x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	84x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	70x

GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	572x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	77x
RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	73x

SSD
Green 120GB (2016)WD $84Bench 53%, 21,990 samples	380x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	49x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	39x

RAM
DDR4 2400 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 76%, 26,065 samples	728x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $40Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	96x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 74%, 24,860 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $370

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16