Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 2957U 2,764 User benchmarks, average bench 38% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	25.4% Poor	Memory 39.6 1-Core 33.7 2-Core 62.8 28% 45.4 Pts	4-Core 66.1 8-Core 69 9% 67.6 Pts	64-Core 67.7 4% 67.7 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz) 43,454 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Zotac(19DA B239) 1,017MB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3496 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	2.12% Terrible	Lighting 2.5 Reflection 3.19 Parallax 3.06 2% 2.92 fps	MRender 3.67 Gravity 1.03 Splatting 3.48 2% 2.73 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.12% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Foresee S600M064G 64GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: N0320A Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 268 Write 135 Mixed 171 42% 192 MB/s	4K Read 28 4K Write 45.9 4K Mixed 22.7 96% 32.2 MB/s	DQ Read 240 DQ Write 158 DQ Mixed 145 123% 181 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 71%
SDXC Card 130GB 62 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 114GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 27 27 28 28 27 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	12% Very poor	Read 30.5 Write 22.6 Mixed 19.3 SusWrite 27 33% 24.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.6 43% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT25664BF160B.C8FE 1x2GB 191 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	24.4% Poor	MC Read 10.3 MC Write 10 MC Mixed 8.9 28% 9.73 GB/s	SC Read 0.2 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 0.6 6% 2.1 GB/s	Latency 204 20% 204 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 30%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 19%

Surfboard

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron 2957UIntelBench 38%, 2,764 samples	1x

GPU
HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 43,454 samples	1x

SSD
32GB SSD 32GBForeseeBench 20%, 1 sample	1x

RAM
CT25664BF160B.C8FE 1x2GBCrucialBench 18%, 191 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16