Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 102% UFO	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 105% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	75.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200401
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 12 '20 at 15:12
Run Duration	292 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	83.2% Excellent	Memory 65.2 1-Core 150 2-Core 295 89% 170 Pts	4-Core 542 8-Core 969 91% 755 Pts	64-Core 1,343 83% 1,343 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 8662) CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.09 Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	123% Outstanding	Lighting 168 Reflection 158 Parallax 154 137% 160 fps	MRender 181 Gravity 144 Splatting 104 113% 143 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HCHP-000H1 256GB 2,368 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 138GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT22H0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 208 196 189 200 192 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	75.7% Very good	Read 478 Write 255 Mixed 232 SusWrite 200 65% 291 MB/s	4K Read 28.7 4K Write 65 4K Mixed 31.8 119% 41.8 MB/s	DQ Read 201 DQ Write 154 DQ Mixed 154 122% 170 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 98%
Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 250GB 4,026 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 200GB free Firmware: EMT41B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 294 292 296 295 295 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	92.8% Outstanding	Read 481 Write 424 Mixed 356 SusWrite 307 88% 392 MB/s	4K Read 37.1 4K Write 64.2 4K Mixed 45.9 149% 49.1 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 166 DQ Mixed 182 137% 183 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 92.8% Great: 118%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 40GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 401 395 181 133 131 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	90.2% Outstanding	Read 479 Write 409 Mixed 381 SusWrite 271 86% 385 MB/s	4K Read 35.6 4K Write 66.4 4K Mixed 45.8 148% 49.3 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 166 DQ Mixed 182 136% 183 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 90.2% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 68GB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 411 406 373 291 260 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	90.2% Outstanding	Read 489 Write 430 Mixed 381 SusWrite 356 93% 414 MB/s	4K Read 30.4 4K Write 63.5 4K Mixed 39.5 130% 44.5 MB/s	DQ Read 201 DQ Write 166 DQ Mixed 180 136% 182 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 90.2% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 46GB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 142 131 124 131 126 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	77.1% Very good	Read 489 Write 422 Mixed 370 SusWrite 147 80% 357 MB/s	4K Read 30.6 4K Write 62.9 4K Mixed 38.8 129% 44.1 MB/s	DQ Read 201 DQ Write 166 DQ Mixed 180 136% 182 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 124%
Intel 545s Series 512GB-$95 12,034 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 78GB free Firmware: LHF004C SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 365 360 377 378 370 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	77.5% Very good	Read 474 Write 399 Mixed 375 SusWrite 367 91% 404 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 37.3 4K Mixed 27.1 90% 29.4 MB/s	DQ Read 199 DQ Write 154 DQ Mixed 158 123% 170 MB/s
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 128%
Samsung MZNLN256HCHP-000H1 256GB 2,368 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 102GB free Firmware: EMT22H0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 293 296 295 294 295 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	93% Outstanding	Read 498 Write 298 Mixed 253 SusWrite 294 75% 336 MB/s	4K Read 32.7 4K Write 81.7 4K Mixed 38 142% 50.8 MB/s	DQ Read 282 DQ Write 240 DQ Mixed 213 173% 245 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 93% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$56 346,786 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	65.1% Good	MC Read 27 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 25.5 67% 23.5 GB/s	SC Read 19.4 SC Write 17.5 SC Mixed 23.7 58% 20.2 GB/s	Latency 113 35% 113 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,306x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $119Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	873x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	835x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	571x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	516x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	406x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	340x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	273x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	265x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	142x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	141x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $1,027

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16