Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 820-$119 2,269 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.75 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	61.9% Good	Memory 91.5 1-Core 75.8 2-Core 123 62% 96.8 Pts	4-Core 184 8-Core 219 26% 202 Pts	64-Core 218 14% 218 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 880M 4,542 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 1521) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.95 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	1.51% Terrible	Lighting 2.03 Reflection 2.96 Parallax 0.81 2% 1.94 fps	MRender 2.95 Gravity 1.53 Splatting 0.52 1% 1.67 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.51% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 730 Series 240GB-$250 8,417 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 159GB free (System drive) Firmware: L201 SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 217 217 218 215 218 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	48.1% Average	Read 215 Write 220 Mixed 188 SusWrite 218 48% 210 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 23.6 4K Mixed 17.7 60% 19.2 MB/s	DQ Read 173 DQ Write 171 DQ Mixed 177 131% 173 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	24.8% Poor	MC Read 8.5 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 6 20% 7 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 10 SC Mixed 8.3 26% 9.23 GB/s	Latency 64.9 62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro FX 880MNvidiaBench 2%, 4,542 samples	228x
Quadro FX 1800MNvidiaBench 3%, 1,209 samples	64x
Mobility Radeon HD 5730AMDBench 4%, 2,535 samples	45x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16