Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.92% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	70% Good	Memory 89.6 1-Core 79.1 2-Core 162 66% 110 Pts	4-Core 288 8-Core 321 40% 304 Pts	64-Core 314 20% 314 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 3800 3,739 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Nvidia(10DE 0661) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	6.92% Terrible	Lighting 9.4 Reflection 7.54 Parallax 4.25 8% 7.06 fps	MRender 8.19 Gravity 7.13 Splatting 5.35 6% 6.89 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.92% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 764GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC44 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 159 Write 101 Mixed 80 84% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 Corsair CMP8GX3M4A1600C8 F3-12800CL9-4GBRL Corsair CMP8GX3M4A1600C8 10GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	43.8% Average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 15.3 MC Mixed 13.6 42% 14.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 14.1 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 67.7 59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	107x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	37x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	25x

RAM
99U5584-007.A00LF 4x4GBKingstonBench 46%, 119 samples	6x
NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG 2x2GBNanyaBench 44%, 1,579 samples	6x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	5x

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $225

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16