| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 36.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 20.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus Commando (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.4 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20061222 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 04 '20 at 00:16 |
| Run Duration | 123 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 13% |
PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
43.1%
Average
|
38% 53.3 Pts
|
7% 53.8 Pts
|
3% 55.3 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
|
36.1%
Below average
|
38% 44.2 fps
|
32% 39.9 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
3 64GB SSD 64GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1207A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 8 9 10 7.2 9 MB/s
|
20.7%
Poor
|
12% 55 MB/s
|
46% 12.3 MB/s
|
8% 14.5 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
512, 1024, 512, 1024 MB
|
17.8%
Very poor
|
15% 5.23 GB/s
|
15% 5.13 GB/s
|
47% 84.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Commando Builds (Compare 27 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus Commando
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 QuadIntel $90Bench 43%, 5,765 samples | 7x |
| Core2 6600Intel $90Bench 37%, 8,894 samples | 3x |
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 3x |
| HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples | 2x |
| GTX 570Nvidia $350Bench 20%, 22,303 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Good | Total price: $300 |