Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FL_A512FL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics12.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FL_A512FL  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512FL
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190619
Uptime7 Days
Run DateNov 03 '20 at 03:46
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 29%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
48.2% Average
Memory 61.8
1-Core 53
2-Core 110
45% 75 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 319
31% 253 Pts
64-Core 313
19% 313 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX250
Asus(1043 1FBE) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2546
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Lighting 15
Reflection 12.2
Parallax 14.9
12% 14 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 14.8
Splatting 18.2
13% 15.3 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
251GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 220 45 71 54 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 1,090
Write 628
Mixed 563
SusWrite 95.7
131% 594 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 76.3
4K Mixed 47.7
165% 55.2 MB/s
DQ Read 338
DQ Write 430
DQ Mixed 221
212% 330 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 118%
Great: 209%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 32GB
28GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 37 23 22 28 16 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 99.3
Write 22.5
Mixed 59.7
SusWrite 28.5
61% 52.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 2.6
164% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.6% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 8.7
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 8.3
27% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FL_A512FL Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FL_A512FL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback