Dynabook SATELLITE PRO C50-E-102

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	7.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	60.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Dynabook SATELLITE PRO C50-E-102 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dynabook DBIIP300
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200826
Uptime	2.9 Days
Run Date	Nov 01 '20 at 20:51
Run Duration	121 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	14%
CPU Throttled	88%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8250U 234,942 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	60% Above average	Memory 68.1 1-Core 77.1 2-Core 153 58% 99.5 Pts	4-Core 280 8-Core 410 43% 345 Pts	64-Core 403 25% 403 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R) 420,154 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(3100 0003) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7926 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	7.48% Terrible	Lighting 7.67 Reflection 11.1 Parallax 8.03 6% 8.94 fps	MRender 12.4 Gravity 7.03 Splatting 15.4 10% 11.6 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.48% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Foresee 512GB SSD 512GB 1,027 User benchmarks, average bench 125% 396GB free (System drive) Firmware: V4.7.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 360 326 325 353 325 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	60.3% Good	Read 355 Write 313 Mixed 301 SusWrite 340 74% 327 MB/s	4K Read 11.5 4K Write 52.4 4K Mixed 9.3 57% 24.4 MB/s	DQ Read 189 DQ Write 206 DQ Mixed 34.8 71% 143 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 241%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244BB0-CPB 2x4GB 1,688 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	57.6% Above average	MC Read 22.6 MC Write 20.6 MC Mixed 17 57% 20.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 25.4 SC Mixed 20.5 57% 20.1 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 68%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE PRO C50-E-102 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Dynabook SATELLITE PRO C50-E-102

CPU
Core i5-8250UIntelBench 53%, 234,942 samples	7x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	7x

SSD
512GB SSD 512GBForeseeBench 125%, 1,027 samples	7x

RAM
M471A5244BB0-CPB 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 1,688 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16