Packard IMEDIA MCE 9310

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2.5GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemPackard IMEDIA MCE 9310  (all builds)
MotherboardNEC GA-8I945PM
Memory1.8 GB free of 2.5 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20050812
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 29 '20 at 22:44
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium D 3.00GHz-$98
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Memory 65.6
1-Core 23.1
2-Core 40
32% 42.9 Pts
4-Core 47.2
8-Core 48.8
6% 48 Pts
64-Core 48.9
3% 48.9 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS
POV(1ACC 0853) 512MB
Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.64% Terrible
Lighting 0.73
Reflection 1.23
Parallax 0.25
1% 0.74 fps
MRender 1.19
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 0.87
1% 0.89 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.64%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD161GJ 160GB-$25
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 100 103 103 101 92 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 108
Write 110
Mixed 58
SusWrite 101
69% 94.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
194% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2GB
null MHz
1024, 512, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
13.8% Very poor
MC Read 4
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 4.2
12% 4.07 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 3.9
12% 4.1 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback