Lenovo 20CLS7T400

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20CLS7T400  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20CLS7T400
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161128
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 21 '17 at 17:03
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User MWI-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5300U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
46.4% Average
Memory 74.3
1-Core 15.7
2-Core 49.3
34% 46.4 Pts
4-Core 103
8-Core 167
16% 135 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Legend(17AA 2226) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.12% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 4.15
Parallax 6
4% 5.08 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 3.5
Splatting 6.65
4% 4.72 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.12%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB3Q128G1001 128GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2230001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
46% Average
Read 362
Write 219
Mixed 280
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 28
4K Mixed 12.8
55% 18.8 MB/s
DQ Read 24.1
DQ Write 46
DQ Mixed 32.6
26% 34.2 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 46%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/8G 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.3% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 7.3
23% 8.17 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 7.5
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 91.8
44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback