Positivo Schoolmate SF20BA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPositivo Schoolmate SF20BA  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo Schoolmate SF20BA
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170720
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateOct 26 '20 at 08:24
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3060
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Memory 49.1
1-Core 24.8
2-Core 49.8
28% 41.2 Pts
4-Core 49.9
8-Core 50
7% 50 Pts
64-Core 49.9
3% 49.9 Pts
Poor: 6%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 28%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Intel(8086 22B1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5144
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.61% Terrible
Lighting 1.67
Reflection 2.73
Parallax 2.41
1% 2.27 fps
MRender 2.62
Gravity 1.67
Splatting 3.17
2% 2.49 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.61%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
19GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 2 1.5 3.5 1.8 3.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 10.8
Write 7.3
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 2.5
8% 6.45 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Mixed 0.1
27% 2 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Team-Ind-1600 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 5.5
19% 6.67 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 3.4
11% 3.9 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback