Acer Nitro AN515-52

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-52  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Freed_CFS
Memory1.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181031
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateOct 26 '20 at 01:15
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
54.6% Above average
Memory 72.2
1-Core 64.6
2-Core 128
53% 88.2 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 294
31% 248 Pts
64-Core 348
22% 348 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1264) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.5018
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
4.96% Terrible
Lighting 4.73
Reflection 21.2
Parallax 5.19
4% 10.4 fps
MRender 7.43
Gravity 4.43
Splatting 12.6
7% 8.14 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.96%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Optane+932GBHDD 1TB
431GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 17.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 103 94 107 101 99 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S1ME-4 Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 8GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
51.3% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 16.7
54% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 12.8
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 96.4
42% 96.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-52 Builds (Compare 5,430 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback