PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 55.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 39.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7C13 |
Motherboard | MSI H310M PRO-VD PLUS (MS-7C13) (all builds) |
Memory | 9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190905 |
Uptime | 1 Days |
Run Date | Oct 17 '20 at 19:28 |
Run Duration | 196 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 20% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
55.4%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
55.3%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
40GB free
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 186 112 55 89 48 MB/s
|
60.4%
Good
|
|||
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 66 68 116 105 107 MB/s
|
39.9%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
74GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 79 79 80 79 MB/s
|
49%
Average
|
|||
Inateck ASM1153E 240GB
20GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 20 32 12 20 14 MB/s
|
||||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
71GB free, PID a208
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 92 90 91 93 93 MB/s
|
39.8%
Below average
|
|||
Intenso Alu Line 32GB
28GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 5.8 5.7 5.4 5.4 6 MB/s
|
4.22%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FHP 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
63.8%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 525x |
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 312x |
Core i7-9700Intel $260Bench 92%, 79,875 samples | 124x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 120x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 116x |
GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples | 96x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 114% - Outstanding | Total price: $161 |