Asus Z170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics33.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive259% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170623
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 17 '20 at 15:51
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Memory 95.3
1-Core 133
2-Core 268
92% 165 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 729
73% 595 Pts
64-Core 727
45% 727 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Lighting 41.8
Reflection 33.1
Parallax 39.7
34% 38.2 fps
MRender 39.3
Gravity 40.2
Splatting 38
32% 39.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74
857GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1260 1326 1364 1339 1350 1349 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
259% Outstanding
Read 1,476
Write 1,554
Mixed 1,086
SusWrite 1,331
307% 1,362 MB/s
4K Read 57.2
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 81.6
272% 97.5 MB/s
DQ Read 620
DQ Write 886
DQ Mixed 263
336% 590 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 259%
Great: 255%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
421GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 476 486 479 481 481 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 466
Mixed 402
SusWrite 478
104% 463 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 68.8
213% 80.2 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 362
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 133%
Great: 134%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
340GB free
Firmware: SBFK71B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 75 79 73 83 80 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32% Below average
Read 226
Write 103
Mixed 86.6
SusWrite 135
30% 138 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 19.2
4K Mixed 11.4
46% 14.9 MB/s
DQ Read 15.1
DQ Write 17
DQ Mixed 15.7
12% 15.9 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 32%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
305GB free
Firmware: CC35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 117 118 119 118 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 119
Write 119
Mixed 68.9
SusWrite 117
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 70%
Samsung SP1614C 160GB-$98
22GB free
Firmware: SW100-27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Read 36.4
Write 41.2
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 37.8
26% 35.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.8
127% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 38
MC Write 41.4
MC Mixed 34.5
108% 38 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 46.3
SC Mixed 33.5
97% 34.1 GB/s
Latency 56.2
71% 56.2 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 107%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 13,901 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $750
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback