Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G4900-$42 1,971 User benchmarks, average bench 52% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	62.3% Good	Memory 91.4 1-Core 101 2-Core 200 76% 131 Pts	4-Core 197 8-Core 191 26% 194 Pts	64-Core 200 12% 200 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 610 1,675 User benchmarks, average bench 3% MSI(1462 7C31) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8873 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.6% Terrible	Lighting 3.23 Reflection 5.42 Parallax 3.69 3% 4.11 fps	MRender 6.71 Gravity 3.87 Splatting 8.7 6% 6.43 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.6% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
INTENSO 512GB 2,578 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 443GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0707B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 381 388 390 390 389 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 507 Write 396 Mixed 390 SusWrite 382 94% 419 MB/s	4K Read 37.1 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 32.2 154% 58.8 MB/s	DQ Read 154 DQ Write 315 DQ Mixed 50 90% 173 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Value DDR4 2400 C17 2x4GB 729 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	75.7% Very good	MC Read 23.7 MC Write 30.8 MC Mixed 25 76% 26.5 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 30.9 SC Mixed 24.5 68% 23.8 GB/s	Latency 65.2 61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 89%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 54%

Yacht

GPU
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	290x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	279x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	213x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	245x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 77%, 23,800 samples	81x
DDR4 2666 2x8GBUnknownBench 75%, 2,111 samples	77x

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $437

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16