HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84FD
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200528
Uptime1 Days
Run DateOct 17 '20 at 07:09
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 35%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$143
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 80.3
1-Core 107
2-Core 205
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 561
63% 482 Pts
64-Core 525
35% 525 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$212
HP(103C 8553) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.3% Above average
Lighting 228
Reflection 181
Parallax 173
60% 194 fps
MRender 127
Gravity 193
Splatting 142
52% 154 fps
Poor: 57%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 67%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 399 323 321 302 317 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 812
Write 596
Mixed 689
SusWrite 331
136% 607 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 72.2
4K Mixed 42.5
140% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 539
DQ Write 508
DQ Mixed 415
341% 487 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 120%
Great: 160%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$35
495GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 135 135 138 138 138 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 151
Write 140
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 135
84% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
170% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 107%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
922GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 99 97 97 99 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 98.4
Write 67.9
Mixed 55.4
SusWrite 97.1
59% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
38.4% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 11.8
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 12.4
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx Builds (Compare 4,382 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $529
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $199Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $275Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $548SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback