Asus STRIX H270F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive16.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus STRIX H270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 15 '20 at 09:45
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User BRN-User
Background CPU 47%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 85.6
1-Core 106
2-Core 190
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 441
49% 387 Pts
64-Core 470
29% 470 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2151 MHz, MLim: 2202 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 446.14
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 13.2
32% 13.2 fps
Poor: 71% Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 112 170 237 223 234 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 91.5
Write 288
Mixed 104
SusWrite 185
38% 167 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.4
4% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 302%
MB2000EBUCF 2TB
653GB free
Firmware: MK7OHPG0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 86 78 59 49 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Read 39.9
Write 96.6
Mixed 54.7
SusWrite 69.8
48% 65.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.3
86% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
474GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 136 140 144 133 132 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Read 172
Write 90.2
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 139
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 113%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 2TB
526GB free
Firmware: 0108
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 34 37 36 34 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Read 33.5
Write 32.6
Mixed 28.4
SusWrite 35.9
24% 32.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.6
155% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 65%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB
309GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 65 62 69 61 61 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 73.8
Write 125
Mixed 90.4
SusWrite 65
125% 88.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.6
170% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot 2666 C16 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
66.9% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 21.3
70% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 19.5
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX H270F GAMING Builds (Compare 1,803 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus STRIX H270F GAMING - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $739
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback