PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Gigabyte A320M-H |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF (all builds) |
Memory | 3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180905 |
Uptime | 1.3 Days |
Run Date | Oct 12 '20 at 16:40 |
Run Duration | 117 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 62% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Athlon X4 950 Quad Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
|
31.5%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.12
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.3%
Poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70
520GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 77 77 106 114 104 MB/s
|
46.6%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 78.C1GS4.4032B 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
18.5%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 331x |
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 324x |
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $82Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 282x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 224x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 192x |
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 171x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 77% - Very good | Total price: $233 |