Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	10.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89 68,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	31.3% Below average	Memory 58.5 1-Core 11.4 2-Core 28.7 25% 32.9 Pts	4-Core 27.5 8-Core 26.3 4% 26.9 Pts	64-Core 1.6 0% 1.6 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Nvidia(10DE 080A) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.07% Terrible	Lighting 1.17 Reflection 2.38 Parallax 0.06 1% 1.2 fps	MRender 2.29 Gravity 0.87 Splatting 1.61 1% 1.59 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.07% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 120GB 15,567 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM91.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 29 39 47 51 62 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	10.7% Very poor	Read 56.6 Write 50.1 Mixed 42 SusWrite 42.1 11% 47.7 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 11.1 4K Mixed 2.2 15% 5.77 MB/s	DQ Read 17.3 DQ Write 53.1 DQ Mixed 10.2 15% 26.9 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 88%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 272GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 55 64 66 66 72 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	25.3% Poor	Read 28.4 Write 33.5 Mixed 22.5 SusWrite 59.9 26% 36.1 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4GB 42,830 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1066, 1066 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	6.22% Terrible	MC Read 2.3 MC Write 1.3 MC Mixed 1.5 5% 1.7 GB/s	SC Read 0.3 SC Write 0.3 SC Mixed 0.2 1% 0.27 GB/s	Latency 132 30% 132 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 6.22% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16