Asrock H370M Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	27.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H370M Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180213
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 11 '20 at 10:27
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	62%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-8100-$110 81,392 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	69.8% Good	Memory 85 1-Core 116 2-Core 229 81% 143 Pts	4-Core 307 8-Core 371 44% 339 Pts	64-Core 445 28% 445 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% MSI(1462 2847) 2GB CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	27.3% Poor	Lighting 31.3 Reflection 29.9 Parallax 37.2 26% 32.8 fps	MRender 40.9 Gravity 39.9 Splatting 33.4 31% 38.1 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra 3D 250GB-$50 5,775 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: X61110RL Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 452 Write 368 Mixed 171 73% 330 MB/s	4K Read 33.6 4K Write 80.6 4K Mixed 33.2 136% 49.1 MB/s	DQ Read 371 DQ Write 263 DQ Mixed 236 198% 290 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80 31,610 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 46GB free Firmware: 3.AAE SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 42 42 43 43 43 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	32.9% Below average	Read 71.6 Write 72.7 Mixed 47.6 SusWrite 42.8 43% 58.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 43%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60 32,476 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 472GB free Firmware: 1AG01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 54 54 54 55 55 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	28.5% Poor	Read 44.8 Write 43.8 Mixed 45.9 SusWrite 54.3 35% 47.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2400 C17 2x4GB 901 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	76.9% Very good	MC Read 28.6 MC Write 30.5 MC Mixed 22.9 78% 27.3 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 29.2 SC Mixed 23.7 67% 23.3 GB/s	Latency 71.9 56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H370M Pro4 Builds (Compare 403 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 30%

Raft

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H370M Pro4

CPU
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	70x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	64x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	55x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	36x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	28x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	26x

SSD
TM8PS7256G 256GBTeamBench 70%, 5,014 samples	38x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	16x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x

RAM
CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 029E CMK8GX4M1A2666C16 16GBUnknownBench 72%, 138 samples	21x
CMK8GX4M1A2666C16 029E CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 16GBUnknownBench 69%, 136 samples	17x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 106% - Outstanding

Total price: $190

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16