Asus CM5675

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics20.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus CM5675  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CM5675
Memory6.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100416
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 10 '20 at 04:58
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 660
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
54.5% Above average
Memory 71.4
1-Core 90.3
2-Core 161
62% 108 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 219
29% 219 Pts
64-Core 219
14% 219 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 480-$500
Nvidia(10DE 075F) 1.5GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 924 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 350.12
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Lighting 23.9
Reflection 37.1
Parallax 26.7
20% 29.2 fps
MRender 36.1
Gravity 19.4
Splatting 27.6
23% 27.7 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 202 214 221 223 223 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.4% Above average
Read 231
Write 224
Mixed 178
SusWrite 204
47% 209 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 54.8
4K Mixed 21.9
92% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 33
DQ Write 89.2
DQ Mixed 26.6
30% 49.6 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 110%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
931GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 137 135 135 137 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
76% Very good
Read 131
Write 136
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 134
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 76%
Great: 74%
Generic External 750GB
60GB free, PID 1340
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 22 12 6.5 1.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 31.3
Write 13.9
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 14.9
24% 19.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
32.4% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 13.9
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 8.5
23% 8.07 GB/s
Latency 98.1
41% 98.1 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CM5675 Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CM5675

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $262
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback