Intel NUC7i5BNB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.41% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemIntel NUC7i5BNH
MotherboardIntel NUC7i5BNB  (all builds)
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180222
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateOct 09 '20 at 22:46
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-7260U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 90.8
2-Core 175
72% 119 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 275
38% 275 Pts
64-Core 276
18% 276 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel Iris Plus 640 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Intel(8086 2068) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6025
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
9.41% Terrible
Lighting 11.8
Reflection 10.8
Parallax 11.4
10% 11.3 fps
MRender 11.7
Gravity 11.3
Splatting 17.3
9% 13.4 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.41%
Great: 10%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 5014
Write 32.6
Mixed 78.4
355% 1,708 MB/s
4K Read 634
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 2.7
965% 213 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 80%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 5742150 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62.3% Good
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 43.4
MC Mixed 11.9
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 11.2
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical NUC7i5BNB Builds (Compare 387 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel NUC7i5BNB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $88
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-10700K $320Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $175
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback