Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics19.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 8.1 is the second most recent version of Windows but it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair IV Formula  (all builds)
Memory6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20120914
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 09 '20 at 21:49
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1075T-$254
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 90.7
1-Core 63.5
2-Core 117
59% 90.4 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 332
36% 278 Pts
64-Core 336
22% 336 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 570-$350
Nvidia(10DE 087E) 1.2GB
CLim: 732 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Lighting 24.9
Reflection 37.8
Parallax 28
20% 30.2 fps
MRender 38.5
Gravity 20.2
Splatting 26.3
19% 28.3 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 20%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial C300-CTFDDAC128MAG 128GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0007
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 96 111 109 111 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.3% Average
Read 217
Write 135
Mixed 150
SusWrite 105
34% 152 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 63.9
4K Mixed 10.2
86% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 28.6
DQ Write 89.4
DQ Mixed 13.6
24% 43.9 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 63%
Hitachi HDS721050DLE630 500GB
264GB free
Firmware: MS1OA650
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 105 97 111 110 111 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 125
Write 118
Mixed 25.4
SusWrite 106
68% 93.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
116% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 81%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
14GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 5.5 5.8 5.6 5.7 5.7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
5.77% Terrible
Read 16.3
Write 7
Mixed 4
SusWrite 6.3
10% 8.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 1.1
64% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.77%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 8GB
667, 200, 667, 200 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.8% Poor
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 9
25% 8.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 7.8
21% 7.2 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 1,377 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $540
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $249Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-11400F $245Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $350Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback