Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	76.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 1,386 User benchmarks, average bench 64% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	55.4% Above average	Memory 44.9 1-Core 93.9 2-Core 183 57% 107 Pts	4-Core 354 8-Core 586 57% 470 Pts	64-Core 1,636 101% 1,636 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 73%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
VK0480GDJXV 480GB 183 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 406GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPG1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 369 392 391 381 358 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	76.5% Very good	Read 315 Write 366 Mixed 279 SusWrite 372 75% 333 MB/s	4K Read 26.2 4K Write 38.7 4K Mixed 30.7 100% 31.9 MB/s	DQ Read 249 DQ Write 206 DQ Mixed 229 171% 228 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B5170FH0-CH9 8x4GB 111 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 8 of 16 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	82.1% Excellent	MC Read 37.9 MC Write 31.3 MC Mixed 32.1 96% 33.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 6.8 26% 9.27 GB/s	Latency 181 22% 181 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 89%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2643 01stBench 68%, 1,437 samples	2x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630L 01stBench 57%, 70 samples	2x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples	2x

GPU
NVS 310NvidiaBench 1%, 4,920 samples	3x
Quadro K600NvidiaBench 3%, 8,087 samples	2x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	2x

SSD
LCS-256 256GBLiteonitBench 78%, 572 samples	3x
XPG SX900 512GBAdata $189Bench 59%, 1,547 samples	1x
MR9260-8i 1TBLSIBench 48%, 9 samples	1x

RAM
M393B1G70QH0-CMA 8x8GBSamsungBench 94%, 283 samples	1x
9JSF51272PZ-1G9E2 4x4GBMicronBench 82%, 908 samples	1x
HMT41GR7AFR8C-RD 8x8GBHynixBench 101%, 50 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16