Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	245% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W-10885M 917 User benchmarks, average bench 85% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	75.3% Very good	Memory 83.6 1-Core 119 2-Core 124 69% 109 Pts	4-Core 360 8-Core 707 63% 533 Pts	64-Core 1,033 64% 1,033 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 100%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kxg60pnv2t04 NVMe TOSHIBA 2048GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 277% 2TB free (System drive) Firmware: 10704103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1749 1572 1341 1302 1355 1302 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	245% Outstanding	Read 1,540 Write 1,586 Mixed 1,056 SusWrite 1,437 316% 1,405 MB/s	4K Read 38.7 4K Write 98.4 4K Mixed 52.8 178% 63.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,069 DQ Write 730 DQ Mixed 874 659% 891 MB/s
Poor: 198% ↑ This bench: 245% Great: 345%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMAA4GS7AJR8N-VK 2x31.5GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 2 slots used 63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	67.7% Good	MC Read 28.2 MC Write 25.8 MC Mixed 21.4 72% 25.1 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 30.8 SC Mixed 7.4 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 74.1 54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 88%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	105x
Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 60%, 344 samples	47x
Quadro T2000NvidiaBench 43%, 3,549 samples	24x

SSD
PC611 SK hynix 512GBNvmeBench 170%, 119 samples	18x
NVMe KIOXIA 512GBKxg60znv512gBench 211%, 4,018 samples	11x
KXG60ZNV512G KIOXIA 512GBNvmeBench 222%, 1,046 samples	10x

RAM
HMA82GS6DJR8N-XN 2x16GBUnknownBench 86%, 2,975 samples	39x
M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 91%, 15,521 samples	34x
HMAA2GS6AJR8N-XN 2x16GBUnknownBench 87%, 1,421 samples	17x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16