Acer NB-TMB117-M-C239

Performance Results

Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop 19%
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer NB-TMB117-M-C239  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Lepus_BA
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170316
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateOct 01 '20 at 18:11
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 77%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Celeron N3150
CHV, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Memory 23.8
1-Core 20.6
2-Core 39.4
17% 27.9 Pts
4-Core 69.9
8-Core 68.7
10% 69.3 Pts
64-Core 68.9
5% 68.9 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Acer(1025 108C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
1.17% Terrible
Lighting 1.33
Reflection 2
Parallax 1.88
1% 1.74 fps
MRender 2.33
Gravity 1.43
Splatting 3.13
1% 2.3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.17%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Liteon CV3-8D128 128GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T871202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 88 86 83 125 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 316
Write 297
Mixed 142
SusWrite 102
48% 214 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 10.2
4K Mixed 8.8
32% 9.7 MB/s
DQ Read 94.2
DQ Write 61.7
DQ Mixed 62.7
51% 72.9 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 5.1
16% 5.57 GB/s
SC Read 1.7
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 2.2
6% 2.27 GB/s
Latency 294
14% 294 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical NB-TMB117-M-C239 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop 29%
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer NB-TMB117-M-C239

The Best.
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback