Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 18% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3150 3,131 User benchmarks, average bench 26% CHV, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	16.7% Very poor	Memory 23.8 1-Core 16.6 2-Core 32 15% 24.1 Pts	4-Core 57.2 8-Core 54.3 8% 55.8 Pts	64-Core 59.6 4% 59.6 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 32%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 108C) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4352 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.38% Terrible	Lighting 1.33 Reflection 2 Parallax 1.88 1% 1.74 fps	MRender 2.33 Gravity 1.43 Splatting 3.13 2% 2.3 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.38% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CV3-8D128 128GB 3,328 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: T871202 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 88 86 83 125 109 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	32.2% Below average	Read 316 Write 297 Mixed 142 SusWrite 102 48% 214 MB/s	4K Read 10.1 4K Write 10.2 4K Mixed 8.8 32% 9.7 MB/s	DQ Read 94.2 DQ Write 61.7 DQ Mixed 62.7 51% 72.9 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix 2x2GB 7,517 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	14.6% Very poor	MC Read 5.6 MC Write 6 MC Mixed 5.1 16% 5.57 GB/s	SC Read 1.7 SC Write 2.9 SC Mixed 2.2 6% 2.27 GB/s	Latency 294 14% 294 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 66%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16