Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics99.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive95.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory22.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190918
Uptime1 Days
Run DateOct 01 '20 at 15:42
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 30%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Memory 74.2
1-Core 139
2-Core 281
88% 165 Pts
4-Core 561
8-Core 1,066
97% 813 Pts
64-Core 1,977
122% 1,977 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Asus(1043 8728) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.8% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 137
Parallax 52.3
108% 108 fps
MRender 162
Gravity 47.6
Splatting 100
83% 103 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-8310A 128GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 86 82 78 74 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 925
Write 106
Mixed 190
SusWrite 80.5
70% 325 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 92.4
4K Mixed 35.3
152% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 145
116% 168 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 139%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
16GB free
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 479
Write 459
Mixed 364
97% 434 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 68.2
4K Mixed 32.5
121% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 311
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 130
140% 234 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 88%
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB
27GB free
Firmware: 03090004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 280 109 228 18 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 451
Write 310
Mixed 310
SusWrite 145
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 59.5
4K Mixed 38.5
128% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 117
96% 137 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
760GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 172 171 174 174 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 172
Mixed 109
SusWrite 172
116% 158 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 101%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
314GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 132 135 139 141 141 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 90.7
Write 120
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 134
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
60% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x16GB-$74
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2800 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.2% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 14.3
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 17.4
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 92
44% 92 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING Builds (Compare 23,288 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $686
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback