Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive	275% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191015
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 01 '20 at 08:11
Run Duration	295 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$412 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Memory 96.6 1-Core 159 2-Core 319 104% 192 Pts	4-Core 637 8-Core 1,210 110% 923 Pts	64-Core 1,683 104% 1,683 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 104%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2018)-$74 6,712 User benchmarks, average bench 262% 330GB free (System drive) Firmware: 101140WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1716 847 877 842 855 787 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	275% Outstanding	Read 1,938 Write 2,309 Mixed 1,810 SusWrite 987 396% 1,761 MB/s	4K Read 46.9 4K Write 182 4K Mixed 72.2 260% 100 MB/s	DQ Read 1,392 DQ Write 1,197 DQ Mixed 1,266 957% 1285 MB/s
Poor: 182% ↑ This bench: 275% Great: 335%
Crucial M500 120GB-$75 15,430 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 81GB free Firmware: MU03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 130 130 130 129 132 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	76% Very good	Read 442 Write 135 Mixed 200 SusWrite 130 50% 227 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 96.8 4K Mixed 35.3 136% 52.7 MB/s	DQ Read 256 DQ Write 135 DQ Mixed 153 125% 181 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 77%
WD WD10JPLX-00MBPT0 1TB 11,708 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 242GB free Firmware: 01.01H01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 79 79 78 78 79 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	41.5% Average	Read 66.5 Write 69.6 Mixed 19.2 SusWrite 77.9 42% 58.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 105% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 75%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159 43,620 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 369GB free Firmware: GM4OA5CA SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 89 89 89 89 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	50.2% Above average	Read 86.7 Write 87.7 Mixed 48.1 SusWrite 88.2 57% 77.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 51%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 4TB 7,970 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 127GB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 44 49 57 52 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	39.5% Below average	Read 87.2 Write 84.2 Mixed 15.9 SusWrite 50.5 43% 59.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.7 117% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 98%
Specific STORAGE DEVICE 2GB 68 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 201a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 4.5 4.5 4.5 4 4.5 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	5.45% Terrible	Read 19.4 Write 3 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 4.3 8% 7.72 MB/s	4K Read 7.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 27% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.45% Great: 7%
Specific STORAGE DEVICE 2GB 68 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 201a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.3 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	5.35% Terrible	Read 18.7 Write 4.2 Mixed 2.5 SusWrite 4.4 8% 7.45 MB/s	4K Read 7.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 26% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.35% Great: 7%
Specific STORAGE DEVICE 2GB 68 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 201a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.2 4.5 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	5.9% Terrible	Read 22.2 Write 3.5 Mixed 2.7 SusWrite 4.4 8% 8.2 MB/s	4K Read 7.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 27% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.9% Great: 7%
VendorCo ProductCode 4GB 1,811 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 5678 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 2.5 2.9 3 2.9 2.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	1.67% Terrible	Read 4.2 Write 0.2 Mixed 2.2 SusWrite 2.7 3% 2.32 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 7% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.67% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GB 6,151 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	104% Outstanding	MC Read 39.1 MC Write 40.4 MC Mixed 30.6 105% 36.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.4 SC Write 45.8 SC Mixed 32 91% 31.7 GB/s	Latency 52 77% 52 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 143%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS MASTER-CF Builds (Compare 8,473 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER - $440

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $412Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	4,850x
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	1,605x
Core i9-9900KFIntel $307Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	553x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1,302x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	649x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	639x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	856x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	564x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	487x

RAM
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	288x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	278x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	252x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 90% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,369

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16