PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 8.04% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision Tower 5810 |
Motherboard | Dell Precision Tower 5810 (all builds) |
Memory | 2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190924 |
Uptime | 0.3 Days |
Run Date | Sep 28 '20 at 14:09 |
Run Duration | 122 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 23% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1603 v3
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
|
56.9%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.59
|
8.04%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
237GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA810
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 80 78 40 60 89 MB/s
|
52%
Above average
|
|||
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
584GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 90 91 86 92 91 MB/s
|
50.4%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Micron 9ASF51272PZ-2G3B1 2x4GB
2 of 8 slots used
8GB RIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
43.9%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-1620 v3IntelBench 72%, 10,197 samples | 1,240x |
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples | 956x |
Xeon E5-1650 v4IntelBench 83%, 3,842 samples | 408x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 414x |
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 386x |
Quadro M2000NvidiaBench 21%, 5,678 samples | 287x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 27% - Poor | Total price: $80 |