Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	13.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	38.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75 104,122 User benchmarks, average bench 63% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	61.3% Good	Memory 59.5 1-Core 108 2-Core 218 69% 129 Pts	4-Core 369 8-Core 339 48% 354 Pts	64-Core 359 22% 359 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics 115,953 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 876B) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.4.2 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Lighting 16.5 Reflection 17.2 Parallax 21.2 14% 18.3 fps	MRender 12.7 Gravity 16.5 Splatting 20.9 14% 16.7 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 13%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$42 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 108GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF400400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 80 64 76 81 75 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	Read 375 Write 275 Mixed 128 SusWrite 83.5 48% 215 MB/s	4K Read 18.2 4K Write 34.8 4K Mixed 7.3 55% 20.1 MB/s	DQ Read 76.1 DQ Write 56.3 DQ Mixed 28.3 31% 53.6 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata 2x8GB 24,552 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	74.6% Very good	MC Read 29.5 MC Write 25.7 MC Mixed 27.4 79% 27.5 GB/s	SC Read 18.5 SC Write 24 SC Mixed 21.9 61% 21.5 GB/s	Latency 129 31% 129 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 98%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	293x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	226x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	204x

Value: 103% - Outstanding

Total price: $322

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16