Asus TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive64.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DD
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 22 '20 at 23:00
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
32% Below average
Memory 22.7
1-Core 69.6
2-Core 136
39% 76 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 406
38% 313 Pts
64-Core 391
24% 391 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32%
Great: 67%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3401103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 352 352 351 356 344 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 421
Write 348
Mixed 355
SusWrite 352
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 16.4
66% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 102
89% 130 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.8% Below average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 13.7
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 8.5
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 301
13% 301 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD Builds (Compare 365 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback