Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (99th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 1 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 3000G-$80 11,076 User benchmarks, average bench 53% AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	67% Good	Memory 83.2 1-Core 90.7 2-Core 162 67% 112 Pts	4-Core 296 8-Core 295 40% 295 Pts	64-Core 299 18% 299 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics 27,821 User benchmarks, average bench 5% MSI(1462 7C52) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.9.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.08% Terrible	Lighting 6.47 Reflection 11.8 Parallax 7.94 5% 8.72 fps	MRender 7.71 Gravity 5.73 Splatting 13 8% 8.82 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.08% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 141GB free (System drive) Firmware: KC45 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 3,853 Write 27.5 Mixed 46.3 937% 1,309 MB/s	4K Read 375 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 1 15,769% 126 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 1x8GB 31,969 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	MC Read 23.2 MC Write 19.7 MC Mixed 17.1 57% 20 GB/s	SC Read 19.8 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 19.2 54% 19.1 GB/s	Latency 74.9 53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	221x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	199x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	164x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	84x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	66x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $38Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	66x

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $298

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16