Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	64.1% Good	Memory 77.4 1-Core 90.3 2-Core 159 64% 109 Pts	4-Core 275 8-Core 408 43% 342 Pts	64-Core 441 27% 441 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 220 19,671 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 830F) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	1.88% Terrible	Lighting 2.17 Reflection 2.35 Parallax 1.31 2% 1.94 fps	MRender 2.67 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 2.65 2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.88% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 240GB 13,500 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 125GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 165 161 148 144 147 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	Read 297 Write 180 Mixed 247 SusWrite 145 49% 217 MB/s	4K Read 18 4K Write 48.1 4K Mixed 26.3 86% 30.8 MB/s	DQ Read 194 DQ Write 240 DQ Mixed 149 131% 194 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-040.A00LF 4x8GB 201 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	34.9% Below average	MC Read 12 MC Write 11.2 MC Mixed 11.4 33% 11.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.9 SC Write 11.4 SC Mixed 11.5 32% 11.3 GB/s	Latency 85.6 47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	58x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	57x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	51x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	18x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	17x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	13x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $454

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16