Monster TULPAR T7 V19.3

Performance Results


Gaming 69% Battle cruiser	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	75.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Monster TULPAR T7 V19.3 (all builds)
Motherboard	MONSTER TULPAR T7 V19.3
Memory	8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190716
Uptime	4 Days
Run Date	Sep 17 '20 at 08:10
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	30%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	89.4% Excellent	Memory 92.5 1-Core 127 2-Core 252 88% 157 Pts	4-Core 464 8-Core 801 77% 632 Pts	64-Core 892 55% 892 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 89.4% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile) 82,746 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Device(1D05 1065) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5167 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	Lighting 97 Reflection 87.1 Parallax 85 79% 89.7 fps	MRender 100 Gravity 78.7 Splatting 73.4 68% 84 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-00000 256GB 3,806 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 119GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXH7201Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 584 396 383 371 367 367 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	226% Outstanding	Read 1890 Write 1,756 Mixed 904 SusWrite 411 276% 1,240 MB/s	4K Read 61 4K Write 134 4K Mixed 81 267% 91.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,004 DQ Write 903 DQ Mixed 1,028 751% 978 MB/s
Poor: 132% ↑ This bench: 226% Great: 261%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 95GB free Firmware: LVM2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 104 116 115 115 115 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	54.6% Above average	Read 78.3 Write 126 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 112 68% 92.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.5 106% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GB 44,819 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	48.5% Average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 13.9 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 16.8 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 63.1 63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TULPAR T7 V19.3 Builds (Compare 193 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 52%

Yacht

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 45%

Yacht

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V19.3

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	193x

GPU
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	110x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	81x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	2x

SSD
MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 190%, 13,215 samples	29x
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	24x
MZVLB256HBHQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 199%, 3,806 samples	13x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	67x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	61x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16