HP ProBook -----

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 14%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 9.78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProBook -----  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1950
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131029
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 15 '20 at 12:35
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-5350M APU
Socket FS1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.78% Terrible
Memory 9.19
1-Core 47.5
2-Core 69.6
22% 42.1 Pts
4-Core 58.1
8-Core 68.4
8% 63.2 Pts
64-Core 30.8
2% 30.8 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 9.78%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8450G
HP(103C 1950) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1301.0
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
1.51% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 2
Parallax 1.59
2% 1.8 fps
MRender 2.05
Gravity 1.43
Splatting 2.22
2% 1.9 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.51%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS725032A7E630 320GB-$89
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GHBOA440
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 71 74 75 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
40% Below average
Read 67.6
Write 50.8
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 71.6
40% 54.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.4
85% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 40%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1L16BC8R2-B1JS 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
8.74% Terrible
MC Read 3.7
MC Write 2.5
MC Mixed 3.2
9% 3.13 GB/s
SC Read 0.7
SC Write 1.9
SC Mixed 3.4
6% 2 GB/s
Latency 411
10% 411 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 8.74%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback