Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J3455 3,455 User benchmarks, average bench 29% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	26.6% Poor	Memory 32.5 1-Core 14.9 2-Core 49.8 20% 32.4 Pts	4-Core 123 8-Core 104 16% 114 Pts	64-Core 120 7% 120 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 15,538 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4974 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.15% Terrible	Lighting 1.07 Reflection 0.77 Parallax 1.19 1% 1.01 fps	MRender 2.19 Gravity 1.4 Splatting 2.48 2% 2.02 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.15% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 256GB 256GB 9,229 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 194GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0628A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 290 149 114 73 81 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	54.6% Above average	Read 388 Write 322 Mixed 324 SusWrite 164 67% 299 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 52.3 4K Mixed 16.6 77% 29.1 MB/s	DQ Read 161 DQ Write 114 DQ Mixed 1.3 38% 92.1 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 166%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	23.9% Poor	MC Read 8 MC Write 11.2 MC Mixed 8.9 27% 9.37 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 3.2 9% 3.2 GB/s	Latency 240 17% 240 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3450IntelBench 27%, 6,637 samples	10x
Celeron J3455IntelBench 29%, 3,455 samples	3x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 15,538 samples	7x
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	6x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	9x
123456789012345678 2x3GBABCDBench 22%, 487 samples	4x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16